What difference does a day make?

When I was taking her class last October, Julie Peters mentioned that she was in the midst of a personal 40-Day Meditation Challenge. Her commitment was to practice meditating for 11 minutes every day for 40 days. I had been negotiating a daily meditation practice for a few years, but I hadn’t ever thought to approach it in such a structured and succinct way – and I was sold!

With the craziness of the holiday season looming, I decided to take on a 61-Day Meditation Challenge. Each day in November and December, I committed to 15 minutes of meditation practice. The challenge wasn’t always easy, but I made it through without missing a day. And, the noticeable impact of this committed practice inspired me to go bigger.

Starting January 1, 2011, as a New Years commitment, I took on a 365-Day Meditation Challenge. I set out to practice meditation for 15 minutes every day for the entire year. And, I stuck to this commitment, no matter how much I didn’t want to or didn’t feel like I had time to, until April 30.

I had followed through with my commit to practice meditation for 180 days in a row – and then, I missed a day. April 30 was an intense, emotional and draining day, and I completely forgot to sit for 15 minutes. I realized the next morning that I had missed a day for the first time since November 1.

Missing a day felt a lot less tragic than I imagined it would. I moved through it with compassion, and I stayed grounded in knowing that the significance of a 365-Day Challenge is not the perfect completion of it, but the day-to-day lessons of the journey. And, missing a day has turned into one of the most powerful lessons of the experience thus far.

Since missing a day, I have noticed a shift in my relationship with the practice. When I feel resistance towards fitting the 15 minute sit into my day, there is a new voice that joins in to support the resistance. This voice offers that missing a day isn’t really that big of a deal or that I’ve done some other sort of practice during the day that makes up for skipping 15 minutes of sitting. This voice was not present before April 30.

Since missing one day, I have found the commitment noticeably harder to keep, and I have missed two additional days since then.

I have learned that unfaltering commitment is unquestionably easier to maintain than faltering commitment. In other words, once a commitment has been broken it is infinitely harder to stay committed, and a common expression capturing this idea is “Once a cheater, always a cheater.”

While the expression is usually used within the context of a committed romantic relationship, it can be taken to a much more global level: once you cheat on a commitment that you have made (to yourself or someone else), it will become significantly more challenging not to cheat on that commitment again.

Whether it is one day of meditation, one kiss, one cookie or one day not going to the gym, I have learned the answer to the question: What difference does one make?

And the answer is all the difference in the world.

When you break a commitment, it is broken – and it takes a great deal more strength and will power to fully recommit.

So with this post begins my 210-Day Meditation Challenge!

Photo by Chris Yakimov @ www.doucy.net

A Seeker seeks Non-Seeking

One of the fabulous things about teaching yoga with YYoga is the opportunity to attend the weekly teacher development sessions they hold. The topics covered in these sessions are very diverse (from anatomy to philosophy to the Feldenkrais Method), and the trainings also provide the opportunity to connect with and learn from other teachers in the community.

I recently attended a session led by Lisa Gibson called Big Mind Meditation.  While even my own understanding of the Big Mind approach is likely still limited, I offer an introductory sentence from their website:

The Big Mind Process, created by Zen Master Genpo Merzel, is a combination of Eastern non-dual wisdom and Western psychological understanding to transmit the essence of Zen in a way that is readily accessible and relevant to the modern day.

The Big Mind process that Lisa led us through involved engaging with different voices, or different aspects of our consciousness. She first asked us to put our named sense of our self aside (so imagine “Sarah” on the other side of the room), and asked to speak to “The Controller.” She then led us to develop our own sense of the voice of “The Controller,” as she asked about what we did, what our role was, how we helped our named self (in my case, Sarah) and how we hindered her.

Lisa then asked “The Controller” permission to speak with different voices. All Controllers in the room said yes, so she moved on to speak with The Skeptic, The Innocent Child, The Damaged Self, The Protector, Fear and a number of other voices.

(If I am losing you completely, this Wikipedia article outlines the technique with more depth: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Mind )

One of the voices I was able to speak from with ease was The Seeker. I am very connected to my seeking self – to put it mildly. But, when Lisa shifted us from the voice of The Seeker to the voice of The Non-Seeker, I was stumped.

She asked the group of Non-Seekers questions about being a non-seeker, and I couldn’t answer because I couldn’t relate to not seeking. While I’m not always seeking things that are commonly lauded as things to seek, I’m always seeking. When I sit in meditation, I am seeking peace, insight and ease. When I sit on the couch and watch my favourite TV show (How I Met Your Mother), I am seeking laughter and light-heartedness.

I wasn’t the only person in the room who felt the lack of a non-seeking voice. A couple people commented on their struggle with the concept, and finally I said, “I don’t think I have a non-seeking voice.”

Lisa directed her attention to me and repeated, “I am speaking to the Non-Seeking self,” a few times.

And, then it hit me.

Only for a moment – maybe two, I was completely present.

I experienced a level of presence that I have never experienced before, and I realized that the non-seeking voice is only accessible when I am completely present. As soon as I start to reflect on the non-seeking voice, I am no longer in it because I am looking to the past.

My mind was metaphorically blown.

I usually have a sense of what my blog posts offer to people, but with this one, I’m not certain what – if anything – I am offering. I am still processing this mind-blowing, “Aha” moment of sorts, but my gut tells me there is something important here.

Maybe I’ll write about that next week…

Still Shaking

I don’t watch TV, per se.  I don’t have a TV with cable set up in my house, but over the past few years, courtesy of the cable of friends, DVDs and the Internet, I have consistently watched three TV shows: How I Met Your Mother (because it’s awesome and makes me laugh), Battlestar Galactica (because I enjoy geeking out with friends over the philosophical questions posed by its narrative), and Grey’s Anatomy (because the deeply developed characters invoke a sense of connection and inspire personal reflection).

Generally, I have been shying away from watching anything fictional, film or TV, that makes me feel intensely scared or sad.  I simply find there is enough to be scared and sad about in the real world; I don’t need to indulge in these emotions in response to fiction.

Thus, I was unexpectedly (and somewhat unpleasantly) caught off guard this year by the season finale of Grey’s Anatomy, which saw the show shift from a character drama to a two-hour suspense thriller!  The suspense of the show kept me completely on edge, and throughout the entire episode, my body was rigid and tense, almost frozen.  My breath was shallow and constricted.  Imagine the kind of tension that draws your fingers to a claw-like formation, and imagine holding that tension for two hours.  That was me.

After the episode was finished, I could feel that my body was still affected – and my emotional state was reflecting it.  I even found myself still feeling on edge the next day, so I decided to practice meditation in an effort to bring stillness into my body.  But, what I found, when I took the time to sit in stillness and listen to my body, was that my body wanted to move.  It wanted to move fast and a lot.  It wanted to shake, release and flow.  Convulse and pulse, shiver and shudder, quiver and quake and still more shake.

And, as I stood in the middle of the room, moving my body with complete inhibition, my thoughts wandered to a powerful and insightful book I read three or four years ago.  The book was Waking the Tiger: Healing Trauma by Peter A. Levine, and in this book, Levine looks at how animals respond to threat – by fleeing, fighting or freezing.  And, he then explains how humans have evolved to a place where their conscious mind overrides the natural response to threat.  He is basically saying I don’t get up and run away from the Grey’s Anatomy series finale because my conscious mind tells me that I am okay – even though my body is communicating that I am not.

What then gets missed, when the mind overrides the body’s impulse, are the movement patterns that bring the body back into balance.  Levine explains, that after an animal escapes danger by freezing, “it will literally shake off the residual effects of the immobility response and gain full control of its body” (16).

We often live very much in our minds, and from this place, it is difficult to connect with the needs of our body, the natural coping responses and inherently animalistic nature.  And, thus, we remain detached and unaware of the residual effects of the immobility response in our bodies.  One of the gifts of yoga and meditation, of stillness, is that it allows us to slow down enough to listen, to develop a body-literacy, and respond in a way that often offers a great sense of healing and release – and I received this gift shaking that morning.